...or start it, as the case may be.
In verse 3, it appears that the bulk of humanity came
to a consensus: "Let's make Babel, a city for ourselves" (evidently
in opposition to the command of God recorded in Genesis 9:7, "Be ye
fruitful, and multiply; bring forth abundantly in the earth, and multiply
therein").
So, in response the Godhead also came to a
consensus (found in verse 7): "Let's make them babble, lest mankind build
a city for themselves!" You think
I’m straining to get this interpretation?
I don't.
Hebrews 11: 8-10 says that "by faith
Abraham... looked for a city which hath foundations, whose builder and maker is
God." Their city was evidently a
direct substitute for the city that God intended for them to seek after.
God had a program and a schedule, but men resisted
it and reworked it to their own liking. Sometimes God will allow such nonsense
(for a while)... and sometimes he won't. This was a "won't" incident.
Personally, I think it was more than just the
geographical dispersion of the population that was important to God. Oh, their
rebellious attitude against His instructions concerning people distribution was
significant, but even more significant was where that rebellion would have led
them
In verse 6 Moses wrote that God said, "This
they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have
imagined to do." Was God opposed to general creativity or something?
Hardly! God was (and is) opposed to the kinds of things that rebellious men
naturally imagine (see Genesis 6:5). He knew that the inhabitants of Babel
would feed off one another resulting in a return to pre-flood levels of
iniquity. So, He stopped it. He hindered societal communication. It was a case
of "divide and conquer.”
For what it's worth, let it be noted that Noah was
still alive at this point. He lived 350 years after the flood. In fact, he was
even a contemporary with Abraham for some 58 years. One has to wonder what Noah
thought when he saw his own grandchildren raising a tower heavenward in
opposition to the God of heaven. Maybe
something like, "Here we go again!"
But, once again, God had a solution. However, this
time it wasn't the destruction of the masses and the salvation of one family.
No, this time it was salvation of the masses through the establishing of a
nation from one family.
Who's idea was it to raise the tower & why this opposition to God??
ReplyDelete“And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth. He was a mighty hunter before the Lord: wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the Lord. And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar.”
DeleteGenesis 10:8-10 KJV
http://bible.com/1/gen.10.8-10.kjv
Nimrod seems to have been the ring leader. The reason: look no further than the depravity of every human heart.
Delete